The World’s Most
ACCURATE
DEFINITIONS OF
RESTRAINT RELATED
TERMINOLOGY!

By Charly D. Miller

While updating content files for the next REPRINT of my EMT-B National Standards Self-Test, 3rd edition
textbook in January of 2011, I discovered that

ACCURATE
Definitions of Restraint-Related Terminology
STILL Remain
Almost Non-Existent!

Whether looking in Medical Dictionary textbooks or searching Medical Dictionary Internet websites, many restraint-related terms are, at BEST, insufficiently definedIF their definition is even OFFERED!

After recovering from my flabbergasted SHOCK at this discovery [I couldn’t believe that, even in 2011, so-called experts have STILL failed to publish accurate definitions of these terms!!!], I quickly assembled and posted this webpage.

I hope you find it helpful!

YOURS, CHAS
[Ms. Charly D Miller]

MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY NOTE:
Because people with little-to-no medical education require this information just as much as medical professionals do, I have minimized the use of medical terminology and defined these terms/concepts as simply as possible. Any reader who is offended by the simplicity of my definitions can – er – seek this information elsewhere. (Good luck with that!)


“PHYSICAL” Restraint
is most accurately defined as one or more human beings applying their HANDS (and/or other of their BODY PARTS) to an individual’s body, for the purpose of preventing that individual’s freedom of movement.

“MECHANICAL” Restraint is most accurately defined as affixing any form of “DEVICE” to any part of an individual’s body, for the purpose of preventing that individual’s freedom of movement.
In the past, the term “MECHANICAL Restraint” was usually used only when referring to METAL restraint devices – handcuffs, chains, ankle “shackles,” and the like. However, any DEVICE used for restraint (be it a roll of gauze, a towel or sheet, a plastic Zip Tie, a Velcro® or leather or fabric cuff/strap, and the like), is a “mechanical” form of restraint.

A “PRONE” Position is defined as someone laying with the FRONT of their body on a surface.

A “SUPINE” Position is defined as someone laying with the BACK of their body on a surface.

[The terms PRONE and SUPINE are accurately defined in printed and Internet dictionaries.
I include them here only to be “complete.”]


© 1997 BioguardianSystems,Inc
“PHYSICAL
FORCEFUL-PRONE-RESTRAINT”
is most accurately defined as placing an individual’s body FACE-DOWN (“prone”) upon ANY surface (such as the ground, a long back board, an ambulance wheeled stretcher, a bed, or any other surface), while Restrainers physically apply pressure with their HANDS (and/or OTHER BODY PARTS) to the Victim’s shoulders, posterior torso (“back”), hips, and/or upper legs – physically preventing the Victim from moving out of the PRONE position.

“MECHANICAL
FORCEFUL-PRONE-RESTRAINT”
is most accurately defined as placing an individual’s body FACE-DOWN upon a MOBILE surface (such as a long back board, an ambulance wheeled stretcher, a bed, or any similar device) and then using a MECHANICAL device, of any sort, to affix the Victim’s body to the mobile surface – mechanically preventing the Victim from moving out of the PRONE position.

© 1997 Howard M. Paul
Clearly, “PHYSICAL” and “MECHANICAL” forms of FORCEFUL-PRONE-RESTRAINT are relatively the same thing: Application of FORCE to an individual’s body while he is in a PRONE position, so as to prevent his movement out of the prone position.
I offer this definition distinction only in an effort to be completely “accurate.”


© 1997 Howard M. Paul
The term “HOBBLE RESTRAINT” has historically been inaccurately defined (even by ME – back in the ‘90s!) as being simply another word for “HOGTIE” restraint.

© 1994 Michal Heron
Technically, the word “Hobble” refers ONLY to the binding of an individual’s ANKLES together!
An individual who is only hobbled is not hogtied.


© 1997 Howard M. Paul
“HOGTIE RESTRAINT”
is universally (correctly!) defined as
  • mechanically binding an individual’s wrists together behind his back,
  • then mechanically binding his ankles together (“hobbling” him),
  • then bending his knees and mechanically connecting his hobbled-ankles to his bound-wrists.

Photo Source = ?

“POSITIONAL ASPHYXIA” is most accurately defined as death that occurs because the POSITION of a person’s body interferes with respiration (breathing), and the person cannot get OUT of that position. Death occurs due to the person’s inability to BREATHE anymore.
ANY position that obstructs the AIRWAY, OR that interferes with the muscular or MECHANICAL MEANS of getting air into and out of the body (the body’s abdominal “BELLOWS” function) will result in a positional asphyxia death, if the person cannot get out of it.

“RESTRAINT ASPHYXIA”
is a form of
POSITIONAL ASPHYXIA!

The factor that distinguishes a “restraint asphyxia” death from a “positional asphyxia” death, is that some form of RESTRAINT is the reason the Victim couldn’t ESCAPE the asphyxiating position.
First proposed in 1993, the phrase “Restraint Asphyxia” has become more widely-adopted since 1998.(1,2) Yet, several other phrases continue to be used when referring to incidents of restraint asphyxia: “Mechanical Asphyxiation,” “Traumatic Asphyxiation,” “Sudden In-Custody Death,” and the like.

2004 PPt Slide, C.D.Miller

Why is this Restraint Asphyxia vs Positional Asphyxia
Definition Distinction IMPORTANT?

When unrelated to restraint, Positional Asphyxia deaths are deaths caused by the “passive entrapment” of an individual – no “person” is responsible for the Victim being unable to escape the asphyxiating position. Thus, the “manner of death” historically assigned to Positional Asphyxia deaths by medical examiners and forensic pathologists has always been “ACCIDENTAL.”
Since 1994, however, educated medical examiners and forensic pathologists have officially recognized Restraint-Related forms of Positional Asphyxia deaths as being quite different from ACCIDENTAL deaths.
Restraint-Related Positional Asphyxia deaths are ALWAYS caused by PEOPLE having acted to physically or mechanically entrap someone in an ASPHYXIATING POSITION.(3-4) Thus, since 1994, the correct “manner of death” assignment for Restraint Asphyxia deaths is now recognized as being, “HOMICIDE.”(5-7)

REFERENCES

ALL references cited above and listed below can be found in Charly’s
RESTRAINT ASPHYXIA LIBRARY!

(1) O'Halloran RL, Lewman LV. Restraint asphyxiation in excited delirium. Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 1993;14(4):289-295.

(2) Reay DT. Death in custody. Clin Lab Med, 1998 Mar;18(1):1-22.

(3) Hirsch CS: Letter to the editor RE: Restraint asphyxiation in excited delirium & the article authors' reply. Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 1994;15:266.

(4) O'Halloran RL, Frank JG: Asphyxial death during prone restraint revisited: A report of 21 cases. Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 2000;21(1):39-52.

(5) Hanzlich R, Hunsaker JC, Davis GJ. National Association of Medical Examiners’ guide for manner of death classification; First edition. Approved by NAME Board of Directors, February 2002.

(6) Wecht CH. Response to the National Association of Medical Examiners position paper on the certification of cocaine-related deaths. Am J Forensic Med Pathol, (December) 2004;25: 362-363.

(7) Miyaishi S, Yoshitome K, Yamamoto Y, et al. Negligent homicide by traumatic asphyxia. Int J Legal Med, Jan 14 2004.

Go to Charly’s Article:
RESTRAINT ASPHYXIA – SILENT KILLER

Return to the
RESTRAINT ASPHYXIA NEWZ DIRECTORY

Go to
CHAS’ HOME PAGE

Email Charly at: chas@novelholiday.com

?? ?? ?? ?? 6