 |
 |
A Comprehensive Review of Frequently Misinterpreted and Misrepresented Restraint Research |
CITATION:
Miller CD. A comprehensive review of frequently misinterpreted and
misrepresented restraint research. February, 2005.
http://www.charlydmiller.com/LIB05/2005chasresearchreview.html
REFERENCES:
(1) Chan TC, Vilke GM, Neuman T, Clausen JL. Restraint position and positional asphyxia.
Ann Emerg Med, November 1997;30:578-586.
(2) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, San Diego, California:
Ann PRICE et al., v. County of San Diego et al. January 8, 1998. –
http://charlydmiller.com/LIB05/1998priceVsandiego.html
(3) Stetter vs. Village of Hanover Park, et al. US District Court, Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division; CAUSE NO. 99 C 7084; deposition of Dr. Tom Neuman, conducted on Monday, March 3, 2003: pages 56-59; lines 6-25, 1-25, 1-20, 4-14.
(4) Moore vs. Guardian Protective Services, INC, and Rural Metro of North Texas, L.P. (MEDSTAR Ambulance); Cause No. 17-187577-01; in the District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, 17th Judicial District; deposition of Dr. Tom Neuman, conducted on Sunday, June 23, 2002: page 22, lines 1-3.
(5) Kapanak vs. City of Phoenix; Superior Court of the State of Arizona; County of Maricopa; No. CV 2001-012136; deposition of Dr. Theodore C. Chan, conducted on Tuesday, August 26, 2003: pages 12-15; lines 23-25, 1-25, 1-25, 1-2; page 17, lines 6-12.
(6) Stetter vs. Village of Hanover Park, et al. US District Court, Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division; CAUSE NO. 99 C 7084; deposition of Dr. Tom Neuman, conducted on Monday, March 3, 2003: page 57, lines 17-18; page 116, lines 2-6.
(7) Kapanak vs. City of Phoenix; Superior Court of the State of Arizona; County of Maricopa; No. CV 2001-012136; deposition of Dr. Theodore C. Chan, conducted on Tuesday, August 26, 2003: page 17, lines 13-24; page 112, lines 7-18.
(8) Kapanak vs. City of Phoenix; Superior Court of the State of Arizona; County of Maricopa; No. CV 2001-012136; deposition of Dr. Theodore C. Chan, conducted on Tuesday, August 26, 2003: pages 14-15; lines 23-25, 1-2.
(9) Kapanak vs. City of Phoenix; Superior Court of the State of Arizona; County of Maricopa; No. CV 2001-012136; deposition of Dr. Theodore C. Chan, conducted on Tuesday, August 26, 2003: pages 15-17; lines 3-12, 4-25, 1-5.
(10) Stetter vs. Village of Hanover Park, et al. US District Court, Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division; CAUSE NO. 99 C 7084; deposition of Dr. Tom Neuman, conducted on Monday, March 3, 2003: pages 115-116, lines 17-25, 1-6.
(11) Kapanak vs. City of Phoenix; Superior Court of the State of Arizona; County of Maricopa; No. CV 2001-012136; deposition of Dr. Theodore C. Chan, conducted on Tuesday, August 26, 2003: pages 115-116; lines 14-25, 1-9.
(12) Howard JD and Reay DT. Letter to the editor re. Restraint position and positional asphyxia
Annals Of Emergency Medicine July 1998; 32(1):116-117.
(13) Reay DT. Hog-Tied Revisited June, 1998;
http://charlydmiller.com/LIB/reaysdiego.html
(14) Vilke GM, Chan TC, Neuman T: Letter to the Editor Re; Patient restraint in EMS.
Prehosp Emerg Care July/September 2003;7(3):417-418.
And: Kupas DF, Wydro GC: Reply by the Authors of Patient restraint in EMS.
Prehosp Emerg Care July/September 2003;7(3):418-419.
(15) Kapanak vs. City of Phoenix; Superior Court of the State of Arizona; County of Maricopa; No. CV 2001-012136; deposition of Dr. Theodore C. Chan, conducted on Tuesday, August 26, 2003: pages 174-175; lines 13-25, 1.
(16) Wecht CH. Response to the NAME position paper on the certification of cocaine-related deaths.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol December 2004;25: 362-363.
(17) Chan TC, Vilke GM, Neuman T. Reexamination of custody restraint position and positional asphyxia
Am J Forensic Med Pathol, September 1998;19(3):201-205.
(18) Reay DT, Howard JD. (Letter to the editor regarding) Restraint position and positional asphyxia.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol September 1999; 20(3):300-301.
Email Charly at: c-d-miller@neb.rr.com